Not Fit for this Future

Photo by Nick Bolton on Unsplash
  • Most international humanitarian and development organisations are very good at responding to the fire-fighting of today. As institutions are analysing what new normals might emerge, it is absolutely integral to go beyond the shiny rhetoric of first order impacts and scenarios. To be anti-fragile requires the conscious work of deeper, longer term implications to better understand the social, structural and policy level shifts that might need to occur.
  • Acknowledging that new normals are emerging of converging, critical uncertainties — it isn’t happening in isolation. There is a lot we don’t know and we cannot possibly espouse to know, and policy and framework design has to build uncertainty into its very layers. Confusing robust scenario design (that inherently are built on uncertainties) with risk modelling forecasts, falls back on assumption #1 mentioned previously.
  • The race to re-framing and re-design programs and services, requires an all of institution transformation. It is not merely about responding to the externalities. It also requires a shift of structure, model, decision making, risk appetite, financing, collaborations, cultures, and internal agility.
  • Taking a broader, inter-connected systems approach to new normals, offers the opportunity for institutional influence of what these normals might be, rather than merely reacting to mitigate the negative impacts of what new commons emerge
  • Unapologetically embracing radical, intersectional equity. This is no longer a ‘cross-cutting’ issue. Our out-dated assumptions cause blind spots, and those that fundamentally need the most protection get missed, because they are either not considered, or not meaningfully integrated into design. The age of top down saviours is well and truly over.
  • Interrogating what has to die so that the right thing can live in institutional redesign, and how to get it to gracefully exit as quickly as possible has to become a common question we ask. Continuing what we have always done because it’s ‘just the way it is’ — without careful consideration — is knowingly irresponsible.

--

--

--

Humanitarian Futures and Strategic Foresight Advisor. Interested in cultural, indigenous, feminist & decolonising futures. All views my own

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

The Empathy Hack — How a Social and Cognitive Exploit Creates Fake News, Aids Trump, and Generally…

INSURRECTIONISTS BARRED FROM PUBLIC OFFICE!

Five Activism Actions for Busy People and Introverts

Don’t Defund the Cops. Defund the ATF.

In very different Christmas messages, Biden discusses Covid and Trump barely makes reference

Tyler Monagan Claims He Was Targeted For Building Motocross Track

What really drives millennial outrage

What Does Walking Around With An AR-15 Really Mean?

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Aarathi Krishnan

Aarathi Krishnan

Humanitarian Futures and Strategic Foresight Advisor. Interested in cultural, indigenous, feminist & decolonising futures. All views my own

More from Medium

The Art of TeamWork: 4 Lessons I Learned from Competitive Basketball

Glass facades and no eaves: the need for better building standards

View from the living room window of an affordable housing unit at the Harry T. Nance Apartments in Brooklyn. Photograph by Danielle Amy

Looking Back at One of Mies van Der Rohe’s Most Famous Buildings

You don’t need an excuse for your story